Expat Investing: Why I Declined a Financial Advisor and Chose Index Funds
An expat investor explains why he declined a financial advisor charging 1.5% fees, the PFIC risks of foreign ETFs, and how passive investing can outperform.
FRANCEBANKINGMOVING TO FRANCE & FRENCH ADMINUNITED STATESFRANCE
Timothy D
3/10/20264 min read
A Word of Caution: When Financial Advisors Approach Expats or Locals
If you spend any time in online expat communities, you’ve probably noticed a common theme: people recommending financial advisors to help manage investments while living abroad. The pitch often sounds reassuring—professional portfolio management, specialized strategies for expatriates, and “low” annual fees.
Recently, I decided to take a call from one of these firms to better understand what they were offering.
The Pitch
The company was based in the UK and explained that they specialized in helping expatriates manage their investment portfolios. Their service, they said, would cost 1.5% per year in management fees.
At first glance, that might not sound unreasonable, but on $1 million, that is $15,000 a year!
Curious what I would get for my money, I asked how they would manage my portfolio. Their response was that they used a proprietary strategy involving a selection of ETFs.
Naturally, I asked a few follow-up questions.
Digging Into the Details
First, I asked whether the funds themselves had fees.
They confirmed that each ETF carried its own internal expense ratio, though the exact costs would vary depending on the fund selected.
In other words, I would be paying:
1.5% annually for their management, and
additional internal fees for each ETF in the portfolio.
Layered fees like this are common in advisory structures, but they can have a meaningful impact on long-term returns.
Next, I asked where the funds were located.
They told me the ETFs were mostly in Europe and mostly domiciled in Ireland.
The PFIC Question
For U.S. taxpayers living abroad, this immediately raises an important issue: PFIC reporting (Passive Foreign Investment Company rules).
PFIC rules can make investing in many foreign-domiciled funds extremely complex and tax-inefficient for U.S. persons. The reporting requirements alone can add significant compliance costs and headaches.
So I asked how their strategy addressed PFIC reporting.
Their response was that they would need to set up a discussion with a senior partner to talk about that topic.
At that point, I thanked them for their time and let them know I wasn’t interested in continuing the conversation.
Why Expats Should Be Careful
Financial advisors targeting expatriates are increasingly common, especially those operating across borders. While some may offer legitimate services, many rely on fee-heavy structures and complicated products that investors don’t fully understand.
A few things to watch for:
High advisory fees (often 1–2% annually)
Layered costs from both advisory fees and fund expense ratios
Foreign-domiciled funds that may create tax complications
“Proprietary strategies” that are often just collections of standard ETFs or other high fee funds
Transparency around fees, taxes, and strategy should always be clear from the beginning.
My Investing Philosophy
Personally, I strongly believe in passive investing using low-cost index funds.
The evidence supporting this approach is overwhelming. Study after study has shown that most actively managed funds fail to outperform simple index strategies over the long term.
According to the SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active) research reports, over 90% of actively managed funds underperform their benchmark over long time horizons.
You can review the research here:
https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/research-insights/spiva/
What the Numbers Look Like Over 10 Years
Fees and small differences in returns might not seem like a big deal in the short term. But when compounded over time, the gap can become substantial.
Let’s look at a simple example.
Imagine investing $1,000,000 for ten years.
Scenario 1: Passive Investing
If that $1,000,000 is invested in low-cost index funds earning 7% annually, the growth would look roughly like this:
After 1 year, the portfolio would grow to $1,070,000.
After 2 years, $1,144,900.
After 3 years, $1,225,043.
After 5 years, the portfolio would reach about $1,402,552.
After 10 years, the investment would grow to approximately $1,967,151.
Scenario 2: Actively Managed Portfolio
Now consider the same $1,000,000 managed by an advisor charging around 2% annually, resulting in a 5% net return after fees.
After 1 year, the portfolio would grow to $1,050,000.
After 2 years, $1,102,500.
After 3 years, $1,157,625.
After 5 years, the portfolio would reach about $1,276,282.
After 10 years, the investment would grow to roughly $1,628,895.
The Outcome:
At the end of 10 years:
The passive portfolio would be worth about $1,967,151.
The actively managed portfolio would be worth about $1,628,895.
That’s a difference of roughly $338,000.
In other words, simply paying higher fees and earning slightly lower returns could cost an investor more than a third of a million dollars over a decade on a $1 million portfolio.
And this example only covers 10 years. Over 20 or 30 years, the difference becomes dramatically larger because compounding magnifies the impact of even small differences in annual returns. And this assumes that those actively managed funds meet the performance of the index, which we know that long-term ~90% of funds fail to meet.
Why Fees Matter So Much
The challenge with advisory fees is that they are charged every single year, regardless of whether the portfolio outperforms or underperforms the market and whether the market goes up or goes down.
A 1–2% annual fee might sound small, but over time it effectively transfers a significant portion of your investment gains from your portfolio to the advisor.
When combined with funds that already have their own internal expense ratios, the total cost can quietly compound against you.
The Bottom Line
If a financial advisor approaches you—especially as an expat—take the time to ask detailed questions:
What are all the fees, both advisory and fund-level?
Where are the funds domiciled?
What are the tax implications for your situation?
Is the strategy actually different from simple low-cost index investing?
Often, you’ll find that the “proprietary strategy” being sold is something you could replicate yourself with a few low-cost index funds—without paying a 1–2% annual management fee.
As always, do your homework and stay cautious. Your long-term returns depend on it.
Disclaimer:
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. The views expressed are my personal opinions based on my own research and experience. Everyone’s financial situation is different, and readers should consult a qualified financial professional before making any investment decisions.
#ExpatInvesting #PassiveInvesting #IndexFunds #PersonalFinance #ETFInvesting #FinancialEducation #LongTermInvesting #WealthBuilding
My Best Money Life
Helping you life your best life in both France and the United States
Disclaimer – No Financial Advice
The content on this website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. We recommend that you consult a qualified professional before making any financial or investment decisions.
Support
mybestmoneylife@gmail.com
© 2026. All rights reserved.
